3:00 pm to 12:00 am
Event Location: GHC 8102
Abstract: As robotic systems become larger and more complex, it is increasingly important to compose them from reusable software components that can be easily deployed in novel systems. To date, efforts in this area have focused on device abstractions and messaging frameworks that promote the rapid and interoperable development of various perception, mapping and planning algorithms. These frameworks typically promote reusability through the definition of message interfaces that are sufficiently generic to cover all supported robot configurations. However, migrating beyond these supported configurations can be highly problematic, as generic data interfaces cannot fully capture the variability of robotic systems.
Specifically, there will always be peculiarities of individual robots that must be explicitly coupled to the algorithms that govern their actions, and no single message or device abstraction can express all possible information that a robot might provide. The critical insight underlying this work is that while the information that contributes to a given algorithm may change from one robot to the next, the overall structure of the algorithm will remain largely undisturbed. The difference is made in comparatively small details, such as varying individual weights or thresholds that influence the results of, but do not otherwise interfere with, the algorithm’s “main” calculations.
This work proposes that exposing a few such points of variation in a given robotic algorithm will allow the modular treatment of a wide array of platform-specific capabilities. A corresponding design methodology is proposed for separating these platform-specific “supplemental effects” from a reusable, platform-independent “core algorithm”. This methodology is evaluated through case studies of two distinct software systems, the first drawn from the realm of autonomous urban driving, and the second from the domain of planetary exploration. The central contributions of this work are:
• A nomenclature and corresponding guidelines for discriminating between platform-independent
“primary” data and platform-specific “supplemental” data;
• Quantified costs and benefits for two technical solutions to isolating the corresponding core algorithms
from their supplemental effects;
• A classification of typical segments of advanced robotic algorithms that can be affected by
platform-specific data;
• A set of principles for structuring such algorithms to simplify the accommodation of future
supplemental effects.
Committee:John Dolan, Chair
David Wettergreen
Jonathan Aldrich
Issa A.D. Nesnas, Jet Propulsion Laboratory