A controlled evaluation of computer- versus human-assisted oral reading
Conference Paper, Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED '01), May, 2001
Abstract
A year-long study of 144 second and third graders compared outcomes (gains in test scores) and process variables (e.g. words read) for Project LISTEN's Reading Tutor, human tutors, and a classroom control. Human tutors beat the Reading Tutor only in word attack. Both beat the control in grade 3 word comprehension.
Notes
to appear
to appear
BibTeX
@conference{Mostow-2001-8210,author = {Jack Mostow and Gregory Aist and Paul Burkhead and Albert Corbett and Andrew Cuneo and S. Eitelman and Cathy Huang and Brian Junker and B. Platz and Mary Beth Sklar and Brian Tobin},
title = {A controlled evaluation of computer- versus human-assisted oral reading},
booktitle = {Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED '01)},
year = {2001},
month = {May},
}
Copyright notice: This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.