Quantifying uncertainty for remote spectroscopy of surface composition
Abstract
Remote surface measurements by imaging spectrometers play an important role in planetary and Earth science. To make these measurements, investigators calibrate instrument data to absolute units, invert physical models to estimate atmospheric effects, and then determine surface properties from the spectral reflectance. This study quantifies the uncertainty in this process. Global missions demand predictive uncertainty models that can estimate future errors for varied environments and observing conditions. Here we validate uncertainty predictions with remote surface composition retrievals and in situ measurements in a field analogue of Earth and planetary exploration. We consider rover transects at Cuprite, Nevada, and remote observations by NASA's Next-Generation Airborne Visible Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS-NG). We show that accounting for input uncertainties can benefit mineral detection methods such as constrained spectrum fitting. This suggests that operational uncertainty estimates could improve future NASA missions like the Earth Mineral dust source InvesTigation (EMIT) and the Lunar Trailblazer mission, as well as NASA's Decadal Surface Biology and Geology (SBG) Investigation.
BibTeX
@article{Thompson-2020-126646,author = {David R. Thompson and Amy Braverman and Philip G. Brodrick and Alberto Candela and Nimrod Carmon and Roger N. Clark and David Connelly and Robert O. Green and Raymond F. Kokaly and Longlei Li and Natalie Mahowald and Ronald L. Miller and Gregory S. Okin and Thomas H. Painter and Gregg A. Swayze and Michael Turmon and Jouni Susilouto and David S. Wettergreen},
title = {Quantifying uncertainty for remote spectroscopy of surface composition},
journal = {Remote Sensing of Environment},
year = {2020},
month = {September},
volume = {247},
}